The rise and decline of lectoral uthoritarianism in russia v g. If we wish to survey the multiple ways in which electoral authoritarian rulers violate normative minimum standards of democratic elections, we have to establish. Secondly, electoral authoritarianism and hybrid regimes are two interchangeable concepts which overarch competitive authoritarianism. Hybrid regimes combine autocratic features with democratic ones and can simultaneously hold political repressions and regular elections. The dynamics of unfree competition boulder, colorado. Jul 28, 2011 this paper appraises the state of the field on hybrid regimes by depicting the tensions and blurred boundaries of democracy and authoritarianism with adjectives. The dynamics of unfree competition today the most common form of political regime in the developing world is electoral authoritarianism. Mar 31, 2016 electoral authoritarianism, according to andreas schedler, is defined as states under the control of a dictator who has successfully established the institutional facades of democracy, including regular multiparty elections for the chief executive, in order to conceal and reproduce harsh realities of authoritarian governance 1. The dynamics of unfree competition 2006, trade paperback at the best online prices at ebay. Pdf military electoral authoritarianism in egypt sahar. Leadership succession and the resilience of electoral.
Filling in the lacuna, this new book presents cuttingedge research on the internal dynamics of electoral authoritarian regimes. The spectrum of nondemocratic regimes richard snyder 292 bibliography 311 tables and figures tables 5. Yet they violate liberaldemocratic minimum standards of. The good thing is that scaring off specters is an easy assignment, 3 in particular for those who fail to believe in scary metaphysical creatures. How to assess electoral manipulation, in andreas schedler, editor. Recently, there has been a proliferation of electoral authoritarian regimes as a result of two different, although not mutually exclusive, forces. Between competitive and hegemonic authoritarianism, demokratizatsiya. Filling in the lacuna, this book presents cuttingedge research on the internal dynamics of electoral authoritarian regimes. An alternative conceptualization and ordering of regimes are subsequently introduced using a configurative approach. Transitions from electoral authoritarianism repositorio cide.
Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. Rather than place regimes on a linear continuum from authoritarianism to democracy, it highlights the multi. Others have argued that even when they are unfree, unfair, and rigidly controlled, elections, parties and legislatures do alter the political dynamics of nondemocracies. Electoral authoritarian regimes hold regular multiparty elections for parliament and the chief executive. Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism oxford, uk. The logic of electoral authoritarianism, a schedler doc. Lynne rienner publishers, incorporated, 2006 political science 267 pages. In electoral authoritarian ea regimes, multiple parties compete for positions of national state power in regular elections that transgress democratic.
Institutional legacy and the survival of new democracies. How does leadership succession influence the dynamics of electoral competition in authoritarian regimes. Purchase instant access pdf download and unlimited online access. Each concise, jargonfree chapter addresses a specific empirical puzzle on the basis of careful crossnational comparison. Andreas schedler, the logic of electoral authoritarianism, in electoral authoritarianism. Lynne rienner publishers, 2006 feel free to contribute with a summary under comments.
Electoral authoritarianism means that democratic institutions are imitative and, due to numerous systematic violations of liberal democratic norms, in fact adhere to authoritarian methods. The notion of electoral authoritarianism ea, or hybrid regimes,4 emerged in the 2000s as a means of analyzing what were believed to be a new type 1. Electoral authoritarianism can be competitive and hegemonic, and the latter does not necessarily mean election irregularities. Yet they violate liberaldemocratic minimum standards of freedom, fairness, and integrity in so systematic and profound ways as to render elections instruments of authoritarian rule, rather. Electoral authoritarianism schedler major reference works. Electoral authoritarianism schedler major reference. Abstract electoral authoritarian regimes practice authoritarianism behind the institutional facades of representative democracy. Striving to explain transitions from electoral authoritarian regimes, the present paper shifts emphasis from the presence of institutions.
Electoral authoritarianism in the third wave of democratization. Many scholars argue that the political regime in contemporary russia exemplifies the global phenomenon of electoral authoritarianism. How do governors build a power vertical in the context of. First, regular elections under tightly controlled party competition. This course is focused on the dynamics of ukraines political regime transformation during independence. Yet they violate liberaldemocratic minimum standards of freedom, fairness, and integrity in so systematic and profound ways as to render elections instruments of authoritarian rule, rather then instruments of democracy. Professor of political science, cide cited by 14689. This introduc17 tory chapter addresses three analytical core issues with which the emergent 18 comparative study of electoral authoritarian regimes is grappling. The emergence and dynamics of hybrid regimes in the postcold war era steven levitsky harvard university lucan a. Lynne rienner publishers, 2006 and the author of the politics of uncertainty. The article proposes the theoretical framework for analysis of procedural factors of stability of authoritarian regimes.
The era of electoral authoritarianism project muse johns. The dynamics of unfree competition 1 by schedler, andreas isbn. Jonathan hartlyn and jennifer mccoy, observer paradoxes. Petr panov and cameron ross, patterns of electoral contestation in russian regional assemblies. It became clear that electoral authoritarianism was not an ephemeral and unstable state.
Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. The dynamics of unfree competition boulder and london. For example, timothy heritage and ralph boulton, russias putin and party suf. Introduction the tization electoral and sparked tsunami a of robust the third and wave widely heralded engaging an research era of democra agenda tization and sparked a robust and widely engaging research agenda. The dynamics of unfree legalized running for president against hosni competition 1127 andreas schedler ed. Electoral authoritarianism and hybrid regimes are two interchangeable concepts that overarch competitive authoritarianism and hegemonic electoral authoritarianism, two subtypes of electoral authoritarianism. Graeme gill the election to the state duma in december 2011 saw a signifi cant setback in the electoral fortunes of the ruling party, united russia ur.
This unique and rich volume makes a substantively important contribution to knowledge about elections as they happen in a large part of the developing. Previous studies suggest that leadership successions tend to result in more competitive elections, creating favorable conditions for political changes. I particularly like how this collection exposes the shadow politics of competitive authoritarian regimes in considerable detail. The term hybrid regime arises from a polymorphic view of political regimes that opposes the. Dominant party authoritarian regimes are relatively narrow in scale, falling under the umbrella of competitive authoritarianism. Participation and boycott in authoritarian elections gail. In t r o d u c t i o n the electoral tsunami of the third wave heralded an era of democratization and sparked a robust and widely engaging research agenda on its causes. Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Ukraines political dynamics in regional comparative.
The logic of electoral authoritarianism andreas schedler methodological challenges drawing boundaries. The dynamics of unfree competition schedler, andreas ed, electoral authoritarianism. The dynamics of unfree competition 2006, trade paperback at the. May 19, 2016 schedler, a 2006 the logic of electoral authoritarianism. Jan 21, 2019 electoral authoritarian regimes hold regular multiparty. May 15, 2015 he is the editor of electoral authoritarianism. Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Is government contestability an integral part of the. Russia and the vulnerability of electoral authoritarianism. A hybrid regime is a mixed type of political regime that is often created as a result of an incomplete transition from an authoritarian regime to a democratic one.
Elections and authoritarianism in the islamic republic of. The uneven playing field serves as a defining distinction between electoral authoritarianism and electoral democracy. Gerschewski about three key strategies autocrat legitimation, repression and cooptation, highlighted in the main functions that perform these strategies in relation to the three main subjects of the interaction of an. Ukraines political dynamics in regional comparative perspective. May 30, 2006 today, electoral authoritarianism represents the most common form of political regime in the developing world and the one we know least about.
Unlike the singleparty or military autocracies that predominated during the cold war era, regimes in kenya, malaysia, mexico, peru, russia, serbia, slovakia, taiwan, zambia, zimbabwe, and elsewhere were competitive, in that. Schedler, a 2006 the logic of electoral authoritarianism. Filling in the lacuna, this book presents cuttingedge research on the internal dynamics of electoral. Way 267 conclusion beyond electoral authoritarianism.
555 798 1589 470 343 1639 54 763 1244 1512 274 779 900 622 25 773 1700 844 972 463 479 690 1265 1497 647